Tag Archives: Pro-Act

FOUNDATIONAL THINKERS IN THE RECOVERY COACHING COMMUNITY-Beverly J Haberle

Beverly Haberle is the Executive Director of The Council of Southeastern Pennsylvania, a non profit recovery advocacy organization. The Council serves the counties of Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery and Philadelphia counties and operates five recovery community centers. The Council provides a wide range of services to families, individuals and the community to reduce the impact of addiction, trauma and other related health issues. Haberle is on the board of directors of Faces and Voices of Recovery in Washington DC. For the past twelve years she has been the Project Director for PRO-ACT (Pennsylvania Recovery Organization-Achieving Community Together) a grass roots organization mobilizing the recovery community, family members and other advocates in developing Recovery Community Centers in the southeastern areas of Pennsylvania.

Every PRO ACT Recovery Community Center has a recovery coaching program within the center. In order to keep a constant resource of recovery coaches to the five centers, Haberle and Fred Martin, another PRO ACT Project Manager have developed a recovery coaching training program. This program, held twice a year for a week, has trained over 700 recovery coaches since its inception in 2006. Under Haberle’s direction, PRO ACT will send trainers to other voluntary organizations devoted to developing similar recovery community centers and recovery coaching programs.

As part of this Recovery Coaching training, Haberle saw the need for ethical guidelines for the recovery coach to follow. As a result Haberle lead a PRO-ACT Ethics Work Group, and with William White, co-authored the Ethical Guidelines for the Delivery of Peer-based Recovery Support Services, which has been mentioned in this book. The text is available for download at: (http://www.bhrm.org/recoverysupport/EthicsPaperFinal6-8-07.pdf ).

Another one of the early projects developed by Haberle and PRO-ACT is the Mentor Plus Program (Haberle, 2000). The Mentor Plus project matched volunteer Mentors with inmates in early recovery (“Mentees”) residing at the Bucks County Correctional Facility (BCCF). The Mentors visited their assigned Mentees once a week during the Mentees’ incarceration. The focus of these visits was the development of a recovery plan that would be implemented upon the Mentee’s release. As the program evolved, it became clear that female Mentees had a great deal more difficulty transitioning out of the institution and implementing a recovery plan than did their male counterparts. The special needs of female Mentees included safe housing, early financial assistance, recovery-conducive employment, assistance with family problems, support for continuing education, and links for co-occurring disorders or other psychiatric support (Haberle, 2007).

Out of that synergy, Haberle guided PRO-ACT to pursue the idea of developing a Center that would combine the goals of providing recovery housing for women who needed it and providing within the same facility a recovery-oriented, gender-specific sanctuary for other women in the community. By this point, the Council had already had 15 years’ experience providing gender specific programming, outreach, and support to women in a recovery community setting. In December of 2004, the Council purchased a building that had once served as a women’s college dormitory in New Britain, Pennsylvania for use as a Women’s Community Recovery Center. Forty-eight volunteers were recruited and trained as recovery coaches, and a 12-session Life Skills program/curriculum was developed to address the barriers and needs that women seeking long-term recovery were most often experiencing. In January of 2006, with great excitement, the first 5 women entered the house as residents (Haberle, 2007).

Of the 28 residents served since January, 2006, 28 women, aged 19-47, have lived at the Women’s Community Recovery Center (WCRC). The Center currently has more than 20 volunteers. A case manager is made available to the residents, to help them address the many problems that residents experience in navigating the traditional treatment system, and to help identify and connect the residents with other community resources. Case managers and peer volunteer recovery coaches work with the residents to develop and implement recovery plans (Haberle, 2007).

In its two years of operation, the WCRC was able to establish a residential recovery support center, recruit and train a core cadre of volunteers, develop a set of core services, establish a sound referral base, and engender strong local community support. Perhaps even more important, 22 out of 28 women residents have obtained employment, 12 of the 19 mothers in residence began visitation with their children, all residents were linked to the local recovery community, 8 have remained involved with WCRC services after leaving residence, and 3 are active volunteers working with other women seeking recovery (Haberle, 2007).

The details of Beverly Haberle’s experience and future vision for the WCRC is detailed in a paper, co-authored with William White called: Gender-specific Recovery Support Services:Evolution of the Women’s Community Recovery Center to the Women’s Recovery Community Center, which is available for download at: http://www.williamwhitepapers.com/pr/Gender-specific%20Recovery%20Support%20Services%202007.pdf

As follows are just a few stories of how the WCRC has impacted women’s lives in Southeastern Pennsylvania:

Marie is a 36-year-old Caucasian woman, single, with one child with special needs. She
has one older sibling, her parents are divorced, and her mother has remarried. Marie was referred for residence at WCRC through a local counseling center. She presented as homeless and is on prescribed Methadone, as well as anti-depressant and sleeping medications. Marie is engaged in ongoing addiction and psychiatric treatment. During residence, she attended the 12-week Life Skills program, attended Twelve-Step meetings, and engaged with a Recovery Coach and a Twelve-Step Sponsor. Marie was able to regain joint custody of her son and successfully complete all of her probation and parole requirements. She also became gainfully employed and took herself off of Medical Assistance. She displayed patterns of taking on roles of responsibility, becoming overwhelmed, then sabotaging herself. She opted to take a career position and relocate to her parents’ home, despite staff feedback about this choice. She subsequently relapsed but was able to return to treatment quickly and re-stabilize. She is currently working part time and is actively involved in WCRC Services, Life Skills, and volunteer activity at the WCRC. She and her son live with her parents.

Faye is a 28-year-old Caucasian woman, single, with no children. She is the youngest of 5 children, and her parents remain married. She was referred for residence through a local counseling center. She presented as homeless, with a past history of treatment for ADHD, but was not taking prescribed medications. Faye was actively engaged in addiction treatment and mental health services at the time of her entry into the WCRC. During her residence, she attended programming activities, the 12-week Life Skills program, and Twelve-Step Meetings, and she also engaged with a Recovery Coach and a Twelve-Step Sponsor. She entered the WCRC with private insurance and was unemployed. Although Faye has a college degree, she took a job in retail and maintained the job throughout her stay of 18 weeks. She completed the program successfully and moved on to rent a room from a woman in the recovery community. Faye continues to be involved in ongoing activities at the WCRC. She currently works in sales and was able to pass her licensing test with support from staff. She manages her ADHD through biofeedback rather than medication. She has maintained abstinence since her discharge.

Hope is a 26-year-old Caucasian woman, single, with 2 children. She is the youngest of three children, her parents are divorced, and her father has remarried. She was referred for WCRC residence through the prison (Bucks County Correctional Facility). Hope presented as homeless, with a history of Bipolar Disorder treated with a prescribed mood stabilizer. She became actively involved in addiction treatment and mental health services through a local counseling center. During her residence, she attended all of the WCRC’s service programs and became actively involved in a Twelve-Step Program. Hope also achieved employment during her residence. Through staff at the WCRC, Hope became involved with the Bucks County Opportunity Council’s self sufficiency program, seeking financial assistance. She rented an apartment in the area and continues to be employed. Hope recently received scholarships to beauty school through the Bucks County Office of Corrections and the Bucks County Chamber of Commerce (Haberle, 2007).

This is part of an ongoing series of publishing chapters from my book: Recovery Coaching: A Guide to Coaching People in Recovery From Addiction. Which will be available on Amazon this spring.

References:
Haberle, Beverly and White, William, (2007) Gender-specific Recovery Support Services: Evolution of the Women’s Community Recovery Center to the Women’s Recovery Community. Part of a series called: Perspectives on Peer-based Recovery Support Services developed for the Philadelphia PA Department of Behavioral Health and Mental Retardation Services, with collaborative effort by the Pennsylvania Recovery Organization- Achieving Community Together (PROACT) and technology transfer assistance provided by the Great Lakes Addiction Technology Transfer Center (ATTC) at: http://www.williamwhitepapers.com/pr/Gender-specific%20Recovery%20Support%20Services%202007.pdf

And

White, William, Haberle, Beverly, with PRO-ACT Ethics Work Group, Ethical Guidelines for the Delivery of Peer-based Recovery Support Services, The text is available for download at: (http://www.bhrm.org/recoverysupport/EthicsPaperFinal6-8-07.pdf ).

Share
Posted in Addiction Recovery Posts | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on FOUNDATIONAL THINKERS IN THE RECOVERY COACHING COMMUNITY-Beverly J Haberle

FOUNDATIONAL THINKERS IN THE RECOVERY COACHING COMMUNITY

 William L. White is a Senior Research Consultant at Chestnut Health Systems / Lighthouse Institute, a past-chair of the board of Recovery Communities United and has served as a volunteer consultant to Faces and Voices of Recovery since its inception in 2001. White has authored or co-authored more than 400 articles, monographs, research reports and book chapters as well as 16 books.

William White tells this story of what motivated him to dedicate his life to addiction recovery:

 I helped get a man released from the drunk tank of a local city jail, connected him to a local AA group and offered daily support to him and his family. He did amazingly well for a few months considering the severity and duration of his alcoholism. It was the week of Christmas when, depressed over the gifts he was unable to provide for his wife and children, he sought the balm of an offered bottle. He was jailed later that day for public intoxication and hung himself during the night in the same cell in which I had first met him. Such suicides were common in those years. When I stood before his body and met later that day with his family, I was overwhelmed by my own ineptness and the meager resources I had been able to muster in my offer of assistance. There were no addiction-trained physicians, no detox units, no treatment programs, no trained addiction counselors. I was enraged that this man had to die in despair in such a despicable place. I think my commitment to spend my life working in this field began that day.

 William White was born in 1947 to an Army family, his father a construction worker and his mother a nurse. His family grew quite large with more than 20 adopted, foster, related and siblings living in a small rural home inIllinois. White received a scholarship toEurekaCollegeand showed an interest in psychology, sociology and history. His first job was with the Illinois Department of Mental Health in 1967, where his responsibilities included touring the wards of the mental health institution and screen the alcoholics and addicts for community placement.

The late 1960’s brought the decentralization of many mental health hospitals. White was exposed to the depraved conditions, the over-crowded wards, the stench of urine, the bizarre and near lethal medical procedures such as lobotomies, shock therapy and forced sterilizations. In the seventies, White became an outreach worker, gathering addicts and alcoholics from jail or hospitals and connecting them with services like Salvation Army shelters, SRO’s and AA meetings. In 1970, landmark funding from the Federal Government channeled dollars to local communities to develop addiction treatment programs to augment the paltry rehabilitation assistance. White worked at Chestnut Health Systems one of the first addiction treatment centers in Illinois, and within months he became the clinical director of the facility.

In 1975, William White began pursuing a master’s degree in Addiction Studies at Goddard College. Upon graduating he worked with the Illinois Dangerous Drug Commission, and then became deputy director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse’s Regional Training Center in Chicago and later transferred to Washington DC. In 1986, White later returned to the Chestnut Health System and co-founded the Lighthouse Institute, a research center focused on developing and disseminating information about addiction treatment.  In 1998, , he published his most recognized book; Slaying the Dragon, a seminal history of addiction treatment and recovery in the US.

William White’s contribution to Recovery Coaching research has been monumental, essentially changing the concept of the process of recovery by researching what has worked with hundreds of individuals with sustained, long term recovery.

 In 2002, William White wrote in partnership with the Fayette Companies of Peoria, IL  Chestnut Health Systems of Bloomington, IL, and the BHRM project (which was funded by the Illinois Department of Human Services, Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse)  wrote “An Addiction Recovery Glossary: The Languages of American Communities of Recovery”  This text included definitions of a new concept called the Recovery Advocacy Movement and reinforced Bill Wilson’s statement: “There are many paths to recovery”. This glossary introduced many emerging terms to addictions treatment field like Family Recovery, Recovery Capital, Recovery Coach and Wellbriety that were not then widely known in the field and have since become capstones of the recovery coaching field.

 In 2003, White and, Ernest Kurtz, PhD. wrote “Linking Addiction Treatment and Communities of Recovery: A Primer for Addiction Counselors and Recovery Coaches”. This article revolutionized the concept of post treatment or after care, introducing ways to achieve recovery for individuals emerging from a treatment center.

 In 2006, White, Michael G. Boyle, David L. Loveland, and Patrick Corrington, turned the addiction treatment field on its ear by publishing “What is Behavioral Health Recovery Management? A Brief Primer” followed by White, Kurtz, & Mark Sanders’ text called “Recovery Management”. Both are time-sustained, recovery focused, documented collaborations between service consumers, the traditional addiction service provider and the non-traditional service providers united in working toward the goal of stabilizing and actively managing the ebb and flow of addiction recovery until full remission and recovery has been achieved, or until they can be effectively self-managed by the individual and his or her family.

 Simultaneously, the Philadelphia Department of Behavioral Health and Mental Retardation Services, commissioned White to write “Sponsor, Recovery Coach, Addiction Counselor: The Importance of Role Clarity and Role Integrity”. White in this document defined a sponsor, a recovery coach and an addiction counselor, clarifying their roles and how the roles can work together.

 How can you define a new role in an industry without defining the role’s ethical responsibility? In 2007, William White and a team from a Philadelphia based Community Recovery Center; called PRO-ACT developed the “Ethical Guidelines for Peer Based Recovery Support Services”.

Between 2010 and 2012, White and his collaborators have focused on developing recovery-oriented approaches to medication-assisted treatment, including integrating recovery coaching and other recovery support services into methadone treatment programs in the U.S.

 In short, no one person has done more for the Addiction Recovery community than William White. White’s sustained contributions to the field have been acknowledged by awards from the National Association of Addiction Treatment Providers, the National Council on Alcoholism and Drug Dependence, NAADAC: The Association of Addiction Professionals, the American Society of Addiction Medicine, and the Native American Wellbriety Movement.

 His pursuit of defining recovery coaching as a volunteer position is quite clear in all of these articles. I applaud this decision and the reasons for it, as it serves a need, in fact fills a gap in addiction treatment that was sorely missing. But today, Recovery Coaching is moving into a new realm, maybe one might see recovery coaching as growing-up, going to college, getting married and having children.

 Recovery Coaching is gaining acceptance, the field is developing benchmarking standards, coaching certification, payment for services, and perhaps in the future, re-imbursement for coaching services by from health care enterprises. Professional associations and conferences have sprung up to aid peer specialists and recovery coaches in developing their skills. Without William White, the acceptance of recovery coaching would never have come about. William White continues to hold true to his adage of being a researcher, and in a recent conversation with him, he warned me that these new developments in recovery coaching and in addictions treatment need more research to substantiate the outcomes, I wholeheartedly agree.

 William White changed addiction recovery into what we recognize today as the Recovery Model that many in addictions treatment are following. He continues to dedicate himself to research, advocacy and writing on addiction treatment, although his wife, children and photographing sunsets in Southwest Florida, enjoy his equal dedication, today.

 William White’s web site is: http://www.williamwhitepapers.com/bio/

To view a video on a presentation William White and his opening workshop at the ROSC – Recovery Oriented Systems of Care Symposium – 2009 Atlanta, Georgia http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfx58zYTZJ8&feature=relmfu

 

This is the first part of the third chapter of “Guide to Coaching People in Recovery from Addiction” a book written by Melissa Killeen and available as an eBook in January 2013 on Amazon.com
 Part Two of Chapter Three: “Foundational Thinkers…” will be posted next week.

 

 

References: Johnson Institute, 2006, Great Lakes Addiction Technology Transfer Center (ATTC) Network, 2006, Philadelphia Department of Behavioral Health and Mental Retardation Services, 2006, The Council of Southeast Pennsylvania, Inc – Pro-Act, 2007, Blackwell Synergy, 2007, Faces and Voices of Recovery.org, thewhitepapers.com, 2011

Share
Posted in Addiction Recovery Posts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on FOUNDATIONAL THINKERS IN THE RECOVERY COACHING COMMUNITY